*Coming Soon* LHEA On-Demand

Designing TRUE Research – Course Intro  
When a researcher, clinician or quality improvement team designs a study, they consider many factors: 
  •     Will this research make a difference – to patients? to society? 
  •     How will we find subjects/patients or data to meet the research criteria?
  •     Will the data answer the research question?  Will it be in an analyzable format?
  •     Are the data sharing plan and the statistical analysis plan robust?
  •     Can we assure patients that their data will be protected and used wisely?
  •     Will the results be robust enough for wide dissemination? Will the results be publishable?
  •     Where do we start?
In this foundational training, you will learn from experts:  
  • how to ensure that patients and their concerns are at the center of the research process  
  • how studies leverage best practices and principles in designing and executing research studies that leverage healthcare data coming from a variety of sources;
  • how TRUE research design promotes Trustworthy, Resusable, Understandable data Elements;
  • how core values and characteristics of learning health systems support RWA;
  • how the use of global data standards and controlled terminologies can build in efficiencies from the start;  
  • what global regulations, guidance and data sharing requirements are applicable for your research.
Additional modules will be available to explore digital health technologies, AI and machine learning, data privacy and case studies.
We hope you enjoy this educational journey – as a patient, clinician, researcher, medical student, protocol author, patient advocate, caregiver, or another interested party. Remember, we are ALL patients!

References
  1. “The Promise and Problems of Real World Data and Evidence (RWD/RWE) for Patients and Companies”, blog by Deborah Collyar, Patient Advocates In Research (PAIR) and Leanne Larson, Parexel Access
  2. Wilkinson, M., Dumontier, M., Aalbersberg, I. et al. The FAIR Guiding Principles for scientific data management and stewardship. Sci Data 3, 160018 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18
  3. Ohmann, C., Banzi, R., Canham, S., Battaglia, S., Matei, M., Ariyo, D., Becnel, L., Bierer, B., Bowers, S., Clivio, L., Dias, M., Druml, C., Faure, H., Fenner, M., Galvez, J., Gheris, D., Gluud, C., Groves, T.,  Houston, P., Karam, G., Kalra, D., Knowles, R., Kreleza-Jeric, K., Kubiak, D., Kushinke, W., Kush, R., Lukkarinen, A., Marques, P.S., Newbigging, A., O’Callaghan, J., Ravaud, P., Schulunder, I., Shanahan, D., Sitter, H., Spalding, D., Tudur-Smith, C., van Reusel, P., van Veen, E., Visser, G.R., Wilson, J., Demotes-Mainard, J., “Sharing and reuse of individual participant data from clinical trials:  principles and recommendations”, British Medical Journal Open, 2017:7:e018647, doi: 10.1126/bmjopen-2017-018647   
  4. ICMJE Statement: https://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/data_sharing_june_2017.pdf  
  5. Good Clinical Trials Collaborative: https://www.goodtrials.org/  
  6. 21st Century Cures Act and FDA: https://www.fda.gov/regulatory-information/selected-amendments-fdc-act/21st-century-cures-act21s t  
  7. Lewis-Kraus, Gideon, “Bitter Pill”, New Yorker, 26 June 2023